Search for: "Self v State"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 14,112
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2009, 8:48 am
In a per curiam decision, the Court of Appeals remanded People v. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 9:59 pm
For doing what you have a critical federal (as well as state) constitutional right to do? [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 9:19 am
The reasons for this phenomenon are addressed below.First, examiners at the United States Patent and Trademark Office are given very little time to issue Actions on what are often very complex and detailed patent applications. [read post]
30 May 2025, 6:00 am
In a unanimous decision on April 17, 2025, Cunningham v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:12 pm
As the Tenth Circuit has explained, “[t]he experience of disrobing and exposing one’s self for visual inspection by a stranger clothed with the uniform and authority of the state ... can only be seen as thoroughly degrading and frightening. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
Here is an excerpt from the introduction: The Supreme Court's unanimous recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 5:59 am
Dussias Federal Indian Law and Tribal Criminal Justice in the Self-Determination Era – Samuel E. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
State v. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:07 am
(Norberg v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 6:30 am
First, the self-deception. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 5:20 pm
The Appellate Division rejected this argument in June 2016 in State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 5:10 pm
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs set out above, see [17]). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 9:32 am
Such discrimination was therefore lawful if it could be justified, i.e. it was a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.Here the Government contended that the discrimination was justified because:1) The regulations further the policy of the Government that only those people who are entitled to income related benefits under national law, European Union law and international law have access to those benefits.2) It encouraged third party nationals, who had children, to be… [read post]
13 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
Supreme Court, which was decided on June 8 in Jackson v. [read post]
13 Jan 2007, 3:44 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 3:00 am
United States, 353 U.S. 391 (1957) (quoting Slochower v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 4:36 am
Update: At Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Kontorovich argues that the ACLU suit will fail: Under the basic Mathews v. [read post]
