Search for: "State v. Battle" Results 4761 - 4780 of 7,532
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Mar 2017, 10:23 am by Eric Goldman
They’ve frequently stayed on the sidelines during Backpage’s battles, content to let Backpage carry the water for everyone. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 11:11 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Joseph Story in his 1842 decision in Prigg v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am by Jeremy Malcolm
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:47 am by Jeremy Malcolm
This included a brief from 17 leading economists [PDF] in the case of Eldred v Ashcroft, which was an (ultimately unsuccessful) legal challenge to the U.S. copyright term extension law. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:48 am by Edith Roberts
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 2:49 am by Jeffrey Taylor
As a prime example, in 2006, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Riegel v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am by Law Offices of Nancy J. Bickford, APC
The Oklahoma Supreme Court issued a decision on November 17, 2015 in the case of Ramey v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:54 am
First, some doctrinal background:  Ever since the 1976 Supreme Court ruling in Buckley v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 8:52 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
 Court watchers equate the Perry case to that of Brown v Board of Education (abolishing the "separate but equal" fallacy in public schools) and Loving v Virginia (holding that a state could not prohibit interracial marriages).Whatever the outcome of the trial, an intermediate appeal to the Ninth Circuit is guaranteed to send this one to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]