Search for: "State v. Greene" Results 4761 - 4780 of 6,664
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2011, 10:24 am by Lyle Denniston
Florida (10-1139), raising the issue of whether a state government interferes with foreign policy by barring state college professors from using any funds to visit Cuba or any other “terrorist state”; and Republica Bolivariana de Venezuela, et al., v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am by Melina Padron
AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) ? [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:10 am by Marie Louise
Mountain States (Patently-O) Court of Appeal of Michigan – Malpractice: Failure to thoroughly advise in settlement negotiations: Viking Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 9:43 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
15 May 2011, 2:00 am
Handel further argued that Schneider v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:17 pm by Mark Bennett
State off-topic: not everything on the net is necessarily true, not … (More as I find them, or in the pingbacks.) [read post]
13 May 2011, 3:33 pm by Victoria VanBuren
However, the arbitration section did not indicate whether state or federal law would apply, providing only that “[a]ll proceedings shall be conducted in the City of Dallas, State of Texas. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:52 am by Charon QC
The debate will run and run… it is not over yet. *** Carl Gardner, author the Head of Legal blog: Mosley v UK [read post]
5 May 2011, 10:42 am
"  The decision indicates that "common interest warranting a qualified privilege" has been found to exist between employees of an organization [Loughry v Lincoln First Bank, 67 NY2d 369], members of a faculty tenure committee [Stukuls v State of New York, 42 NY2d 272], and employees of a board of education [Green v Kinsella, 36 AD2d 677]. [read post]
5 May 2011, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In Kovitz v Wenig, Ginsberg, Saltiel & Greene, LLP ;  2011 NY Slip Op 50768(U) ;  Decided on April 26, 2011 ;  Appellate Term, Second Department we see one such unfortunate outcome. [read post]
3 May 2011, 1:30 am by Adam Wagner
The court of appeal began by stating, quite plainly, that “torture is wrong”. [read post]