Search for: "State v. Levell "
Results 4761 - 4780
of 29,466
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2021, 8:56 am
To improve surveillance, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists has recommended that all L. monocytogenes isolates be forwarded to state public health laboratories for subtyping through the National Molecular Subtyping Network for Foodborne Disease Surveillance (PulseNet). [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 8:29 am
The AFP v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 10:26 am
The statute contains viewpoint and content-based restrictions to speech which are subject to strict scrutiny as per prior precedent like Reed v. [read post]
3 Jul 2021, 9:57 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 12:47 pm
Additional Resources: Gross v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:19 am
At the most basic level, judicial declarations of unaccountability can go to the head. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 8:06 am
(Discussed with its conseqeunce for state liability with respect to the conduct of their SOEs HERE). [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:58 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:51 am
At even a surface level of analysis, we can immediately see that this visuocentrism is problematic. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:01 pm
We can’t revive expired criminal SOLs, according to the Supreme Court in Stogner v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:44 pm
“First, leveling the playing field—promoting speech on one side of an issue or restricting speech on the other—is not a legitimate state interest,” the court wrote. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:00 am
We had previously written about Iriotakis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 10:00 am
We had previously written about Iriotakis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
At a more conceptual level, the contribution begins to consider the ramification in the post global era of the state as its own legal subject. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 8:48 am
See, e.g., Kimble v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
The judge questions the state’s interest: “leveling the playing field—promoting speech on one side of an issue or restricting speech on the other—is not a legitimate state interest. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:03 pm
The state argued the court may impose crime-related prohibitions pursuant to State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:35 am
On June 11, 2021, in Yu v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 12:08 pm
In Hudson v. [read post]
