Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 13,698
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Oct 2017, 8:54 am
Fan Fi International, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 6:31 am
"You can never have too many accessoriesNintendo alleges infringement of its registered Community designs through the sale of the products and use of the images. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:00 am
For Friday enjoyment, I post Pirri v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:29 am
Tradition Financial Services, Inc., September 26, 2017, Bolden, V.). [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
Todd v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:07 am
In Janus v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:22 am
Morris from the Ninth Circuit, and NLRB v. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:22 am
Morris from the Ninth Circuit, and NLRB v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 1:21 pm
(Morris v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Janet Kowal v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:43 am
Ear Charms, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:08 am
Another interesting question might be whether any of these obviously offensive applications will satisfy the essential predicates to registration, and actually adorn the Principal Register, with official Certificates of Registration issued in the name of the United States of America? [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
In 2003, LegalZoom received a “cease and desist” order from the North Carolina State Bar on the basis that its non-licensed “legal technicians” were actively involved in document review and preparation.[12] The Missouri Federal Court later upheld the order on a motion for summary judgment, agreeing that LegalZoom’s platform went beyond a “do-it-yourself” service and crossed the boundary of unauthorized practice.[13] The result of the federal court… [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 1:09 am
The company also registered the name as a trademark in all European countries as national marks, e.g. the UK (TM 508257). [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
Case law and a cuppa Sad as I am I actually read them over a cup of tea, such as the bizarre case of Regina v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:35 am
Carpenter relies on United States v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 5:17 am
United States, holding that the use of a “Stingray” cellsite simulator required a warrant under the Fourth Amendment, Chris Seaton and Andrew King were challenged to debate whether the Third-Party Doctrine or the Supreme Court’s Riley v. [read post]
