Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 4761 - 4780 of 7,111
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Forte, Andrew Geronimo, Raymond Ku, Stephen Lazarus, Kevin Francis O'Neill, Margaret Christine Tarkington, Aaron H. [read post]
10 May 2011, 12:22 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/825688.no1.pdf State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 8:27 pm by Ilya Somin
Hall – a four-decade-old precedent concerning states' immunity from lawsuits in other states' courts – in a 5-4 decision along ideological lines, Justice Stephen Breyer wrote in dissent that none of the four factors justified the majority's reasoning. [read post]
27 May 2007, 10:11 pm
Seth at Quizlaw tells us that; Section 6103 of Title V of the United States Code reads, in relevant part: (a) The following are legal public holidays: … Memorial Day, the las [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 1:29 pm by Amy Howe
But if you want to multitask by getting some background on the substantive arguments before the Court while you listen, you could try the 2013 oral arguments in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 11:30 am
Stephens, 462 U.S. 862, 877 (1983); Lowenfield v. [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 11:07 am by Eric Goldman
I think another example is the CASE Act, proposing to create a copyright small claims court without the typical due process protections provided in state or federal court. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 9:44 am by Adam Feldman
Regents of the University of California, involving the Trump administration’s decision to unwind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, known as DACA; and New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 7:57 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
"In Krishnan Murgai AIR 1980 SC 1717, the Supreme Court went further and stated that even if a provision in the Act is based on English Law on a particular aspect, the extent and scope of the provision must be governed by the statute itself and not by the English doctrine. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 10:04 pm
Rumsfeld (2006), indicated to be a "conflict not of an international character" between the United States and al Qaeda in Afghanistan. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 7:39 am by David Gans
City of Chicago on behalf of leading constitutional scholars across the ideological spectrum, including Randy Barnett and Stephen Calabresi, urging the Supreme Court to hold that the right to bear arms is a privilege and immunity of national citizenship protected from state infringement by the Privileges or Immunities Clause. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 7:21 am by Joshua Matz
Circuit opinion of Seven-Sky v. [read post]