Search for: "State v. Tech" Results 4761 - 4780 of 5,373
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
 "Copyright owners are part of the problem [of the growing strength of the culture of the public domain]", he states. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 4:39 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Or more flexibility for new tech and interests as they arise? [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
These sound like business decisions: promotional value v. backlash. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Stated motivation: “Brand is a guarantee for quality. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Can't Escape Hotfile's Claim of Abusing Anti-Piracy Tool http://t.co/E7PLsMuYNK via @feedly -> Link to Disney v. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am by Cyberleagle
Current state of play The government’s newest list of priority offences (those to which the proactive duty would apply) mostly involves individuals as victims but also includes money laundering, an offence which does not do so. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 5:02 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Tech itself may allow for secrecy—chemicals that are hard to reverse engineer v. machines that are easy. [read post]
For more information and for a review of the latest changes to state laws, please check out Seyfarth Shaw’s 2019-2020 edition of its 50 State Desktop Reference. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:04 pm by Berin Szoka
Net Neutrality, Slippery Slopes & High-Tech Mutually Assured Destruction, Berin Szoka & Adam Thierer, Progress Snapshot 5.11, Oct. 2009. [read post]
14 Jul 2013, 5:45 am by Barry Sookman
Again http://t.co/y0unOiUO3M -> Computer and Internet Law Weekly Updates for 2013-07-06: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2013-06-28: Com… http://t.co/68wn0271oo -> Crass and Offensive Tweets by Student May not Justify Suspension — Rosario v. [read post]