Search for: "The People v. Cross" Results 4761 - 4780 of 6,173
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2011, 10:36 am by Sarnata Reynolds
The Supreme Court struck indefinite detention down as an affront to liberty in Zadvydas v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 2:10 pm
Zeininger´s defense argued that the Constitution´s Sixth Amendment gives people the right to cross-examine the witnesses against them and also referred to a United States Supreme Court case, Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 9:00 am by Record on Appeal
We are pleased to welcome fellow blogger and attorney Charley Foster from Planet Kauai in a discussion of State v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 10:49 am by Michael M. O'Hear
 In fact, it turns out that Minnesota has far more total people under criminal-justice supervision than Wisconsin. [read post]
18 May 2011, 8:34 am by Eric Turkewitz
Scott Greenfield (one of my co-defendants) instantly dubbed the suit Rakofsky v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:18 pm by Tung Yin
Seems like a cross between "The 4400" and "Prison Break. [read post]
14 May 2011, 10:45 am by Lawrence Solum
The Legal Theory Bookworm recommends The Collected Essays of John Finnis: Volumes I-V and Natural Law and Natural Rights (Second Edition) by John Finnis. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:43 pm by zshapiro
Though eight victims testified at trial at sentencing the court relied upon the investigation of Postal Inspector Evelyn Cross who testified at the hearing that he harmed over fifty people and that there was a loss of more than $200,000. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:08 pm
This means that many people who weren't intoxicated were arrested based on faulty test results. [read post]
12 May 2011, 12:08 pm
This means that many people who weren't intoxicated were arrested based on faulty test results. [read post]
11 May 2011, 12:37 pm
I just bought the day access to Sunday Times to download it [this proves that some people are prepared to pay for access to online material, but this is not the point of this post so please read on ...] [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:16 pm by JT
People v Agostini, 2011 NY Slip Op 03752 (4th Dept. 2011) Great line from the Fourth Department “[d]efendant contends that he was denied a fair trial based on the prosecutor’s cross-examination of his wife concerning her prior employment as an exotic dancer. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:10 am by Kevin Houchin
  It’s happened here on Lawyerist, and I’ve used this tactic offensively myself in the iFart v. [read post]