Search for: "United States v. California" Results 4761 - 4780 of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
 There is still time to register for the Supreme Court Historical Society's commemoration of Juneteenth, a conversation with Judge Curtis Collier and the Society’s Executive Director, Jim Duff, on the lynching of Ed Johnson in 1906 and the resulting US Supreme Court decisions, United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This statement allegedly violates California law because more than ten percent of the condoms’ wholesale value allegedly derives from natural latex material produced outside of the United States. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 1:01 pm by Florian Mueller
Orrick of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California still didn't necessarily have to stay the related infringement claims. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 9:58 am by Dave Maass
Related Cases: Automated License Plate Readers- ACLU of Southern California & EFF v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:26 am by Dan Ernst
Called the Baumes Law, after its principal author and advocate New York Senator Caleb Baumes, the law remains one of the harshest habitual offender laws ever passed in the United States. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 11:58 am by Tim Zinnecker
(Judge Klein's lengthy opinion, Assoc. of Retired Employees, et al. v. [read post]
While federal common law is not explicitly mentioned in § 1331, the fossil fuel companies cite precedent under United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:25 am by SHG
  The first, from the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, is United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:00 pm
Remote sellers are exempt from collection obligations if they have less than $500,00 per year in sales in the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
Federal officers or agencies sued or prosecuted (a) A civil action or criminal prosecution commenced in a State court against any of the following may be removed by them to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place wherein it is pending: (1) The United States or any agency thereof or any officer (or any person acting under that officer) of the United States or of any agency thereof, sued… [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:10 am
  McNeil countered that consumers were not misled by its advertisements.The parties have engaged in various out-of-court disputes as well as this action and the two cases already settled, one in France and one in the United States. [read post]