Search for: "United States v. David"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 6,867
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
Jean PEARSON v the United Kingdom – 40957/07 [2011] ECHR 2319 (13 December 2011) January 4, 2012 European Court of Human Rights: State investigation into death of drug abuser with history of mental health problems was sufficient to satisfy Article 2 ECHR. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 8:46 am
Zimmerman & David M. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:29 am
Tuesday, Jan. 17 • The Supreme Court will hear arguments in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
The defendant were based in the United States. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 9:47 am
E185.96.A730 1993 Regenstein Baldwin, Lewis V. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 7:52 am
A number of states have changed their legislation to include this exception to the double jeopardy rule, including Ireland, Denmark, Germany, and of course the United Kingdom. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 6:56 am
For United States Dept. of Justice, Interested Party: Susan Frances Knight, U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 3:11 pm
On December 12, 2011, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve this issue. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:35 am
Stanford’s court-appointed attorneys -- Scardino & Fazel partners Ali Fazel and Robert Scardino, solo John Parras and Ken McGuire of the McGuire Law Firm – no longer want to defend Stanford, the former chairman of Houston’s Stanford Financial Group (SFG).The lawyers allege in their Jan. 11 motion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:35 am
Stanford’s court-appointed attorneys -- Scardino & Fazel partners Ali Fazel and Robert Scardino, solo John Parras and Ken McGuire of the McGuire Law Firm – no longer want to defend Stanford, the former chairman of Houston’s Stanford Financial Group (SFG).The lawyers allege in their Jan. 11 motion in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am
At Cato@Liberty, Trevor Burrus predicts that the Court will summarily reverse the Montana Supreme Court’s recent decision upholding the state’s ban on independent expenditures by corporations – a ruling that Burrus calls an attempt to “nullify” Citizens United. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 2:58 pm
The Supreme Court has developed this concept further since Youngstown; the most frequently cited case is Dames & Moore v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
BLANK, in her official capacity as the Acting Secretary of the United States Department of Commerce, Defendants. ____ _______________ Last week, ALDF amended its complaint to include a standing claim based on “existence value. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:41 pm
United States (U.S. fiduciary duty)United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
Construing a state regulation as “environmental” doesn’t insulate it from Commerce Clause review, as the town of Clarkstown, New York found out in C&A Carbone, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 3:30 pm
My team is the United States armed forces. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am
Federal Election Commission, in which a federal district court upheld a federal ban on campaign contributions by foreigners, as limiting the scope of Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:01 pm
” That sounds an awful lot like the plausibility standard that the United States Supreme Court created for federal Rule 12(b)(6) motions to dismiss in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. [read post]
