Search for: "Washington v. State"
Results 4761 - 4780
of 17,223
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2018, 3:05 am
Supreme Court: Baker Doesn’t Have to Place Pro-Gay Marriage Message on Cake” [Dale Carpenter, Peter Tatchell, Lee v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 9:49 am
Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 8:33 am
The justices once again did not act on several high-profile petitions for review that they considered at last week’s conference, including a case involving whether the state of Washington violated a florist’s constitutional rights by requiring her to provide flowers for same-sex weddings despite her religious objections and a challenge to a 2018 rule that expanded the definition of “machinegun” under federal law to include “bump-stocks” –… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 7:37 am
In Smigaj v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 4:46 pm
The case is EPIC v. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 8:37 pm
” The case cite is Ott v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:12 pm
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that “Supreme Court questions California law requiring antiabortion centers to disclose that the state provides abortion services. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 4:35 pm
We touched on it a bit yesterday, but today's roundup is quite heavy on United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:33 pm
Among them was a holding that Miller v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 1:42 pm
Buzzard (Major Crimes Act; Discovery; Cherokee Nation) United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court briefing is now complete in Riegel v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 7:20 am
In Lozano v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 9:08 am
Westrick v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 1:36 pm
The decision in Brown v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:08 am
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that during the argument, “two of the court’s most experienced practitioners recounted the founding of the union and the framing of the Constitution, and both claimed the notion of state sovereignty was on their side. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 8:01 am
With a few exceptions the Supreme Courts of the United States both in Washington and 50 state capitals are courts of “limited jurisdiction. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:32 am
Eakins v. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 2:29 am
Since the Court’s 1984 ruling in Strickland v Washington, the United States Supreme Court has applied a two part test for determining whether counsel was ineffective: (a) whether there was a breach of counsel’s duty to the defendant; and, (b) “but for” that error, the defendant stood a reasonable chance for acquittal. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 12:24 pm
In United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2024, 6:30 am
Fraley, Washington and Lee University School of Law, has published What Roosevelt Did to Brown v. [read post]
