Search for: "*king v. U. S"
Results 461 - 480
of 577
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 6:58 am
Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 2:09 pm
King’s guilty plea should not be binding where he was not permitted to enter an Alford plea. [read post]
25 Oct 2005, 10:00 pm
Aunque algunos choferes eran más flexibles, otros llevaban la prohibición hasta sus últimas consecuencias: el pasajero negro tenÃa que pagar el boleto en la parte de adelante, para luego bajarse del micro y entrar por la puerta de atrás para que ni siquiera posara sus pies sobre el sector blanco.Parks fue arrestada y se la condenó a pagar una multa de u$s 10 , más… [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 7:53 am
” Upon her response of “ok,” Anderson sent the message: “When you arrived I wanted to do u,” and this emoji: United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
U. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 12:53 pm
Maryland, 373 U. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 5:45 am
See People v. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 3:05 pm
Moore, 562 U. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 2:53 am
Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
As the UK’s Serious Organized Crime Agency warned advertisers, “By incorporating advertising from recognized brands the website administrator attempt[s] to make the site appear legitimate. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 6:49 am
King, 2018 WL 4868127 (N.J. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 4:46 am
Now there’s a fourth, Bak v Rostek, 2020 NY Slip Op 33142(U) [Sup Ct Kings County Sept. 25, 2020], in which a 47.5% member of a single-asset realty-holding LLC sold his membership interest to the other 52.5% member for around $900,000 based on a $1.9 million valuation assigned by the buying member. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:20 pm
U. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
Cohen, 2012 NY Slip Op 50030(U) (Sup Ct Kings County Jan. 12, 2012), decided last week by Brooklyn Commercial Division Justice Carolyn E. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm
Eva Blum-Dumontet has written a post for Privacy International’s website about government’s battles against encryption. [read post]
