Search for: "1-16 Does" Results 461 - 480 of 18,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm by Jon Sands
Two interesting issues: (1) when does permission to reenter need to take place; and (2) Batson.The defendant was removed from the United States in 2015. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 10:22 am by Tom Kosakowski
 The case citation is LG Bochum 16.03.2016 (II-6 Qs 1/16). [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 12:38 pm by Jon Sands
Watson, No. 16-15357 (2-1-18)(per curiam w/Wallace, Watford, & Sands). [read post]
7 May 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
[E]ven assuming that defendants or any City officials treated plaintiffs’ unfairly during the permitting or inspection process (and again, the evidence does not support such a finding), a reasonable trier of fact would have no basis to conclude that treatment impacted the October 16, 2019, eviction from the property on this record.Wisconsin State Journal has more on the decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 6:17 am by Sean Hanover
Note that DC does not prosecute statutory cases over the age of 16, however, contributing to the delinquency of a minor can still be a problem here, too. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 6:16 am by Wells Bennett
 Does each accused understand his right to be present, along with the bad consequences that might follow even a knowing, voluntary decision to absent himself? [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Furthermore, as explained above, claim 1 does not include any such method step for treatment.It follows that claim 1 of auxiliary request 1 does not fall under the exception clause of A 53(c).The issue of exception from patentability has to be decided on the basis of the given wording of the claim as indicated above (possibly taking into consideration additional information provided in the description, which was not necessary in the case at issue). [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 6:50 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This does not affect certain Iraqis and Afghans applying for SQ and SI SIVs. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
From SSRN:Mohammad Abdullah , Analysing the Role of Shariah Supervisory Boards in Islamic Financial Institutions, (February 1, 2012).Joanie Sompayrac and Victoria Rose Burge, Does the Defense of Marriage Act Prevent the Internal Revenue Service from Treating All 'Married' Couples Equally? [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:11 am by Jon Gelman
Dugan Bros. of N.J., 1 N.J.Super. 13, 16–17 (App.Div.1948) .Relevant here is consideration of Rule  4:50–1(f), which provides that a court mayvacate a judgment for “any other reason justifying relief from the operation ofthe judgment or order. [read post]
30 Dec 2007, 9:51 am
State, 153 P.3d 38 (2007), the Court held that Nevada's habitual criminal statute does not violate Apprendi. [read post]