Search for: "A. R. F. Products, Inc. v. the United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2016, 6:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 10:43 am
EPA, 690 F.3d 733 (6th Cir. 2012). [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 3:35 pm
See Agrizap, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 6:00 am
United States, 449 U.S. 383, 390 (1981). [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:38 pm
United States, 607 F.2d 695, 702 (5th Cir.1979). [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
4 May 2020, 5:45 am
Title 35 of the United States Code consistently refers to inventors as natural persons. [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:16 am
Shat-R-Shield, Inc., 885 F.2d 854, 856, 12 USPQ2d 1132, 1134-35 (Fed.Cir.1989); W.L. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:48 pm
United States District Court, E.D. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
[6/9/09 PM Update: The United States Supreme Court just cleared the Chrysler sale! [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:54 pm
Geneva Pharms., Inc., 344 F.3d 1294, 1303 (11th Cir. 2003), Schering-Plough Corp. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
Federal and state laws require similar elements to prove misappropriation of trade secrets. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:38 am
LaPorte, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 12:12 pm
For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit upheld the denial of leave to proceed anonymously in a case implicating possession of marijuana. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:00 am
Mohawk Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 3:01 am
Of course, the effectiveness of purported limitations on warranty liability varies from state to state. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 12:02 pm
Sprint Nextel Corp., 501 F.3d 1354 (Fed. [read post]
