Search for: "ACTAVIS"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,006
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2015, 4:18 am
Furthermore, the previous week the England and Wales Court of Appeal issued a decision in Actavis UK Ltd & Ors v Eli Lilly & Company [2015] EWCA Civ 555, which also involved Swiss-type claims.It is interesting to compare the two decisions, particularly because, in my view, the UK court managed to completely undermine the European prohibition on patents for methods of medical treatment and must surely, therefore, be wrong! [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 9:59 pm
Actavis in 2013, courts (predominantly district courts) have grappled with the scope of the decision. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:36 am
.* A novel becomes a saga - Actavis v Lilly set to go on and onThe IPKat blogged last year about the masterful and erudite judgment of Mr Justice Arnold in Actavis v Lilly (judgment on BAILII here), concerning pemetrexed. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:34 am
Please do not read this post if you have already read Jeremy’s beautifully succinct summary of the recent appeal hearing between Smith & Nephew and ConvaTec, and have absolutely no inclination to get further bogged down in numerical semantics. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 4:53 am
The ongoing case between Warner-Lambert (a subsidiary of Pfizer) and Actavis concerning pregabalin (sold by Pfizer under the trade mark Lyrica, and by Actavis under the trade mark Lecaent) seems set to be the case of the year. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 4:10 am
PatLit features a guest post from Richard Kempner, Brian Whitehead and Stuart Jackson on the brace of recent Court of Appeals patent decisions (ConvaTec and Actavis v Lilly) which are currently preoccupying those good souls who spend their lives seeking to extract meaning from patent claims and descriptions. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 12:30 am
So what could possibly go wrong for Actavis? [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 50 [week ending on Sunday 7 June] - Swiss claims | Italian-sounding trade marks for cosmetics | “IP litigation and Enforcement” event | Saving WiFi | Spy scandal at the EPO | Rihanna v DC Comics | KitKat trade mark | Taste trade marks in the Netherlands | Connectivity and human rights | Trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege | 3-d printing and counterfeiting | Ericsson v Apple in the… [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
Actavis, the Supreme Court confirmed that reverse payments can violate the antitrust laws. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
Almost all of these updates have been compiled and crafted by our good friend and dedicated colleague Alberto Bellan, to whom the IPKat and Merpel raise their paws in a respectful and grateful salute.Don't forget: there's also a mini-summary at the bottom of the post that lists the features carried by this weblog over the previous month.Last week's substantive Katposts look like this:* Swiss claims: a Kat reflects on the Warner-Lambert v Actavis appealAfter… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:20 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 48 [week ending on Sunday 31 May] - The meaning of EPO appeal system | 3D Printing and the law | Epo and external investigation firms | Umbrella designs | US Supreme Court in Commil USA, LLC v Cisco Systems | European Inventor Award | FIFA and brand integrity | Warner-Lambert v Actavis | Wine in Black GmbH v OHIM | IP and busking | Swiss-style claims.Never… [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
Warner-Lambert sued, because they considered that the Actavis product was still likely to be prescribed for the patented indication and that Actavis was liable for such sales.In a first judgment, Arnold J denied interim relief to Warner-Lambert, holding that a Swiss form claim required subjective intent on the part of Actavis that the drug would be used for the treatment of pain, that Warner-Lambert had no pleaded case on subjective intent, and that therefore there… [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 12:52 pm
The ruling requires Actavis to keep Namenda IR on the market. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 9:55 am
Actavis, Inc., 133 S. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:33 pm
* Warner-Lambert v Actavis; the Court of Appeal has its say on second medical use claims in the UKIPKat readers who have followed this saga will know that, earlier this year, Mr Justice Arnold gave the first detailed consideration of what a Swiss-form claim means [see blog posts here and here]. [read post]
31 May 2015, 9:59 pm
• Defendants: Actavis Laboratories FL Inc.; Andrx Corp.; Actavis Inc.; Actavis Pharma Inc. [read post]
31 May 2015, 3:47 am
Last week the Court of Appeal said that was incorrect in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and that actually all that is required is for the infringer to know, or be able to reasonably foresee, that the medicament would be used to treat the condition (Katpost here). [read post]
28 May 2015, 8:36 am
In a judgment handed down today Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556 the Court of Appeal (led by Lord Justice Floyd) has put forward a wider test for the infringement of second medical use patents. [read post]
25 May 2015, 4:15 am
******************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 46 [week ending on Sunday 17 May] – Whyte & MacKay Ltd v Origin Wine UK Ltd and Dolce Co Invest Inc | "Three aspects of information: Current issues in trade secrets, client confidentiality and privilege" -- a new event | CJEU upon distribution right in Dimensione Direct Sales srl and Michele Labianca v Knoll International SpA| UK Supreme Court on Mere reputation and passing-off | 14… [read post]
25 May 2015, 1:28 am
In this respect this Kat has pondered whether Mr Justice Arnold’s decision Warner -Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 72 (Pat) is a good one in respect of the interpretation of Swiss style claims (Katpost here). [read post]
