Search for: "ALTERNATIVE BRANDS, INC. " Results 461 - 480 of 900
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 8:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
ESD also oversees the marketing of "I LOVE NY," the State's iconic tourism brand. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
There was insufficient evidence of reputational injury as an alternative theory; Industria didn’t provide any evidence even showing that it had any particular US reputation to be harmed. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:41 am by Luis J. Diaz
In contrast, in Verizon California, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 10:00 pm by Dan Flynn
In 2012, Sunland Inc. in Portales, NM, was blamed for an outbreak of Salmonella Bredeney involving 42 people in 20 states. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schutz Container Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:33 pm by dbmadmin
Under the settlement agreement, Bosch must sell the RTI Brand to Mahle Clevitte, Inc. along with all the assets necessary to operate Bosch’s current U.S. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 9:06 pm by News Desk
See your health care provider discuss alternative treatment options. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
  The plaintiff’s alternative has been disguised private FDCA enforcement actions presented as “parallel violation” claims.And we expect to see it again now that PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm
Brands, Inc., 555 F.3d 984, 994 (Fed. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:24 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
As he understood the Book of Revelation, the Mark of the Beast brands followers of the Antichrist, allowing the Antichrist to manipulate them. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 8:57 pm
Alternatively, Microsoft contends the evidence was not sufficient to support the jury's verdict of validity. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:10 pm by Eric Schweibenz
  OUII argued that consent orders are an alternative to a finding on violation and therefore it is inappropriate and misleading for Georgia-Pacific to alleged that fourteen Respondents admitted to infringement just because they entered into consent orders. [read post]