Search for: "Access for the Disabled, Inc." Results 461 - 480 of 1,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm by Lindsay Stafford Mader
His firm, which focuses on veterans’ law issues, exclusively employs disabled veterans. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 8:03 am by Eric Goldman
Critically, receipt of a notice of claimed infringement does not mandate that a service provider remove or disable access to allegedly infringing material. * Rodriguez v. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 9:57 am by Elim
Schjerning, Disability Insurance Law in Canada, 2d ed. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Likewise, the prospect of denying library patrons with print disabilities access to books and other print materials, didn't go over big with Judge Harold Baer, Jr. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Likewise, the prospect of denying library patrons with print disabilities access to books and other print materials, didn't go over big with Judge Harold Baer, Jr. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 2:15 pm by Lloyd J. Jassin
Likewise, the prospect of denying library patrons with print disabilities access to books and other print materials, didn't go over big with Judge Harold Baer, Jr. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:46 am by Patricia Salkin
Get Back Up, Inc v City of Detroit, 2015 WL 1089662 (6th cir. unpub. 3/13/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://www.ca6.uscourts.gov/opinions.pdf/15a0207n-06.pdfFiled under: ADA, Current Caselaw, Fair Housing Act Amendments, Special Use/Exception Tagged: ADA, FHA, residential substance abuse facility [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 12:00 am by Gail Lamarche
Jan. 17, 2017) (“Neither Busch Gardens’ nor SeaWorld’s online website is a physical or public accommodation under the ADA); Access Now, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 12:00 am by Gail Lamarche
Jan. 17, 2017) (“Neither Busch Gardens’ nor SeaWorld’s online website is a physical or public accommodation under the ADA); Access Now, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 5:53 pm by Joel O'Malley
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 12-1226, which involves the extent to which employers must provide pregnant employees work accommodations provided to other non-pregnant workers with work limitations under the PDA. [read post]
Flambeau, Inc., and remarked that the courts applied the safe harbor provision too expansively “to support employers’ imposition of penalties on employees who do not answer disability-related questions or undergo medical examinations in connection with wellness programs. [read post]