Search for: "Advocates v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 12,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2018, 1:48 pm by David Super
     Much of the rhetoric supporting an Article V convention from all of its advocates romantici [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 2:36 pm by Geoff Schweller
The letter notes that the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in Digital Realty v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
Marion County Department of Child Services and Child Advocates, Inc. [read post]
3 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Tom Smith
The justices are expected to issue a final ruling on the case in question, Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 10:10 am by Kent Scheidegger
  One interesting case, National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:30 pm
It describes how legal cases brought by these workers, including O'Bannon v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 10:03 am
Yesterday same-sex marriage advocates notched two more federal district court wins in southern states. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
Scott Yeager, began by advocating for what he called a "straightforward application" of the Court's collateral estoppel analysis in Ashe v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The question is whether, on that day, he was an advocate, a journalist or an advocate journalist. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 8:16 pm by Kate Howard
Advocates for Basic Legal Equality, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 9:10 am by Eleanor Mitchell, Matrix
The Supreme Court will spend the first half of this week hearing the appeals in three related cases: R (MA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, R (A), and R (Rutherford). [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 1:35 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
A few of those are as follows: In the closely watched matter of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:28 pm by Ted Frank
All those consumer advocates complaining that AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
The prosecution, in response, advocated for a temporal limitation on that principle, arguing that statements given sufficiently later in time from abusive behavior should still be admissible. [read post]