Search for: "Affordable Express Corp."
Results 461 - 480
of 632
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2019, 4:00 pm
The final rules do not explain how an offer of an ICHRA can satisfy the ACA employer mandate requirement that coverage must be “affordable. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 5:42 am
(Corp. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 2:44 pm
This affords the authors a moment to reiterate Microsoft’s interest in the proper role of government. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
AUKUS: Biden’s New Security Agreement On Sept. 15, the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia announced a new security agreement. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 10:50 am
A New York Probate Lawyer said the plaintiff, an undocumented alien from Ecuador, immigrated to the United States in 2000, and was hired as a construction worker by the third-party defendant, City Wide Building Corp. [read post]
23 Dec 2012, 12:00 pm
The plaintiff, an undocumented alien from Ecuador, immigrated to the United States in 2000, and was hired as a construction worker by the third-party defendant, City Wide Building Corp. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 2:12 pm
NLRB Law Memo 09/06/2007 by LawMemo - World's Best. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 11:39 pm
Policing debt collection to assure compliance with limitations bars. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 8:12 am
The title was designed to express where the book was coming from. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 1:24 pm
Plaintiffs did not argue that Wal-Mart had any express corporate policy against advancement of women. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 6:25 am
[37] The Buckley court also distinguished "express advocacy" from "issue advocacy. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Corp., 602 F.3d 57, 63 (2d Cir. 2010) (citing Warner Bros. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
Perhaps there are those who simply cannot afford to insure a vehicle in New York, yet need a car for work or personal necessity. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 3:12 am
Where a plaintiff cannot produce direct evidence of an employer's discriminatory intent, the plaintiff may prove his case with circumstantial evidence under the burden-shifting scheme of proof established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2016, 8:12 am
The Supreme Court has defined it in several different ways, including “speech that proposes a commercial transaction” and “expression related solely to the economic interests of the speaker and its audience. [read post]
5 May 2017, 9:12 am
How might this case resolve (or aggravate) rule-of-law concerns that the Federal Circuit has recently expressed, especially as to separation of powers under the Chenery doctrine? [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 3:43 am
Environmental Tectonics Corp., 493 U.S. 400, 406 (1990)) – from ‘declar[ing] invalid the official act of a foreign sovereign performed within its own territory’ (Kirkpatrick, supra, at 405). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:41 am
First of Omaha Service Corp., 439 U.S. 299 (1978), accorded deference to the OCC with respect to the very statutory provision (Section 85 of the National Bank Act) at issue under the Proposed Rule. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 4:53 am
AmeriCorps and Peace Corps are two other prominent employers that qualify. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 5:00 pm
Corp. [read post]
