Search for: "Alter v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 10,483
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2023, 10:50 am
But even if there were, the situation would not be altered by having due regard to the PSED. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 2:50 pm
From Tomlinson v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:12 pm
Stickman IV's opinion in Doe v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 10:05 am
In the August 23, 2023 opinion in Moore v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 5:00 am
., advised the Town of Mount Pleasant that it was intending to build a residential facility for six developmentally disabled adults, the Town objected and requested a hearing pursuant to the state’s Mental Hygiene Law.After the Acting Commissioner of the New York State Office for People with Developmental Disabilities rejected the Town’s objections and approved the project, a special proceeding [pursuant to CPLR Article] was filed with the New York State… [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:24 am
Given the Ninth Circuit decision in Martin v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 10:20 am
From yesterday's decision in Cajune v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:42 am
Secretary of State before implementing any technical changes. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:05 am
Montague v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:36 pm
From today's decision in Eknes-Tucker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
A separate bill would eliminate the authority of the SEC to regulate shareholder proposals in their entirety, mirroring the objective of an ongoing lawsuit intervention by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in National Center for Public Policy Research v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
A separate bill would eliminate the authority of the SEC to regulate shareholder proposals in their entirety, mirroring the objective of an ongoing lawsuit intervention by the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) in National Center for Public Policy Research v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:53 am
In People v Hutt, the defendant refused to let medical personnel draw his blood and refused to provide a urine sample despite a warrant authorizing these samples. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
Haywood v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 8:17 am
" Saxe v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 6:13 am
" Likewise, Rosenblatt v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:04 am
U.S. v. [read post]
