Search for: "Ames v. Baker" Results 461 - 477 of 477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2007, 4:11 am
This Wednesday, Oct. 3rd: 10:00 AM [at Sullivan High School, Sullivan, Indiana] - Jeffrey Douglas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 1:40 pm
This week, I am back to posting primarily legal scholarship about the Supreme Court and the cases decided this past Term. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 10:10 am
Meanwhile, during the Warren Court, when the lower federal courts and the Supreme Court could both be considered liberal, the Court loosened justiciability rules considerably in cases such as Baker v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
Judge Baker is a smart man (and I am not a smart man), but I would have liked to see his thought process--show his work a little--on that issue.On the argument issue, Judge Baker found error in the trial counsel arguing that the case was about justice for the victim of the uncharged misconduct. [read post]
10 May 2007, 10:33 am
See, e.g., Posting of Happy Fun Lawyer to Appellate Law & Practice (noting the 5-5 split in Baker v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:13 pm
Not only do I think such instruction is error and should not be given in any such case, I am unable to agree that the language used in the appellate court cases cited is appropriate in any context. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:55 am
Baker, 276 Ga. 822, 823-824 (586 SE2d 303) (2003) (Benham, J., dissenting) I am equally at a loss to comprehend why the majority would deny the petition for certiorari in this case of gravity and public importance, which also presents an issue of first impression. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 11:47 pm
Baker says the difference is the product - speech v. nonspeech. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 8:32 pm
Here's a good passage written by Justice O'Connor that ties federalism to the protection of freedom (from Gregory v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 10:53 am
As set out in Judge Baker's opinion:Prewett and his wife, Georgia Prewett (Georgia), reside in Daviess County. [read post]
9 Jun 2006, 5:49 am by Tobias Thienel
Greece and Germany), i.e. by customary international law which the state has no choice but to follow (this goes to the justification of the infringement).However, the doctrines applied in the American cases cited do not follow from public international law (see Baker v. [read post]