Search for: "Andrews v. State of California" Results 461 - 480 of 895
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2015, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
California just passed a similar fair pay law, discussed here, and states are wise to pick up the slack from Congress’s failures. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:05 am by The Federalist Society
The question is whether the California Court of Appeal erred by holding that a reference to state law in an arbitration agreement governed by the Federal Arbitration Act requires the application of state law preempted by the Federal Arbitration Act. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 1:51 am by INFORRM
The South East Counter Terrorism Unit used a Production Order under the Terrorism Act to obtain the laptop after he interviewed a British-born Islamic State fighter. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am by INFORRM
Jerry Brown has signed the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act into Law. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:07 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Eichler, Jr.Case number: 12-cv-10692 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2012Qualifying Judgment/Order: May 11, 2015 7/31/2015 10/29/2015 2015-75 SEC v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zuiderveen Borgesius, Utrecht University – Centre for Intellectual Property Law and University of Amsterdam – Institute for Information Law (IViR) The Right to Be Forgotten v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 5:31 am
District Court for the Northern District of California:  Luna v. [read post]
26 Aug 2015, 3:52 pm
It at first seemed a little harsh to me that the California State Board of Pharmacy revoked Andrew Sternberg's pharmacy license just because he was the pharmacist in charge when someone else stole some drugs from the office. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” The appellate court added that “other courts interpreting identical insured v. insured exclusions have reached the same conclusion. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
State limits choices of individuals to protect them from consequences of their own decisions. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm by Jon Sands
  The opinion suggests that the state all but conceded that this was the proper outcome of the case under Carey v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
“Someone could have put their hand in the window and unlocked the door and taken the kids” [Lenore Skenazy/Free Range Kids; related stories here and here; similar, Illinois Policy] Police warn that plan in Scotland to provide state guardian for every child could backfire in abuse investigations [Telegraph, more on “named person” scheme] Also from Scotland: Law Society says proposed ban on liquor promotion is so broad it might snag parent wearing rugby-sponsor… [read post]