Search for: "Application of Harms" Results 461 - 480 of 23,062
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2017, 6:19 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti and Maya Atrakchi
Below are additional resources to help navigate biometric information protection laws: Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act FAQS Washington Joins Growing List of States with Laws Protecting Biometric Information Illinois Class Actions Spark New Attention For Biometric Data Applications [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 9:55 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  The court found that the delay was sufficiently explained by Home Comfort’s oppositions to KCI’s trademark registration applications and extensive settlement discussions. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:06 am by Curt Cutting
"  The defendant, challenging a punitive damages award of $5 million, raises questions about the application of the due process limitations on excessive punitive damages in cases involving intentional harm and nominal damages: 1. [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 6:55 am by Rob Robinson
The scale of damage, and the speed at which it can be perpetrated by AI applications or through the extension of large machine learning models across domains and industries requires concerted effort. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
USCIS’s decision on an arriving alien’s application for adjustment under the CAA is not reviewable by the Immigration Judge, Board of Immigration Appeals or the AAO. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 4:12 pm by Mike Danko
A parent can sometimes be liable for the harm his or her minor child causes to others. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 2:54 pm by admin
The EEOC seeks to recover past and future wages for all female applicants harmed by Mavis’ alleged actions, as well as placement in the jobs Mavis is claimed to have denied to them. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 2:25 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This was in reference to the circumstances in which serious harm can be inferred in the absence of evidence of harm; the applicability of the common law repetition rule and the rule in Associated Newspapers Ltd v Dingle [1964] AC 371 excluding the admissibility of publications to similar effect. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 12:25 pm
Using Fig. 3 wouldn't have been so harmful, since it does not look to be of two piece construction like Fig. 4, nor did the spec describe the door in Fig. 3 as "separately manufactured. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 6:34 am by Mathews P. George
” A person cannot bring a rectification application challenging the registration unless the rectification applicant exhibits that he is harmed by the registration. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 8:00 pm by Patricia Salkin
Upon CAB’s applications, the DOB issued building permits for a major alteration at the subject property. the Supreme Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and granted the DOB’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 9:53 am by DeFrancisco & Falgiatano
Unfortunately, in some cases, the court will dismiss a person’s medical malpractice case in its entirety if the defendant physicians offer sufficient proof that they did not deviate from the applicable standard of care. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 5:26 pm
A coalition of consumer advocacy and public interest groups recently filed an amicus brief at the CAFC, arguing that the PTO's "continuation rule changes" would curtail abusive behavior by patent applicants and improve patent quality.The brief continues the same themes raised in earlier amicus briefs at the district court, that endless continuations harm the public good and hinder innovation. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 2:42 am
” The LSAT is a de-minimus prophylactic that, if used properly, can help protect students from harm. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:46 pm by Allan Blutstein
District Court for the District of Columbia, that the agencies have failed to respond to their Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests within the law’s applicable time-frame.Read more here. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 8:54 am by Allan Blutstein
.) -- concluding that: (1) with exception of one email authored by FDA, agency properly invoked Exemption 4 to withhold its file concerning company’s unsuccessful application to produce single-use surgical masks as personal protective equipment during COVID pandemic; (2) agency met foreseeable harm test because all information protected under Exemption 4 was barred from disclosure under the Trade Secrets Act. [read post]