Search for: "Application of Jones" Results 461 - 480 of 3,903
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
The case also presents the question whether a public-accommodation law that authorizes secular but not religious exemptions is generally applicable under Employment Division v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm by Sophia Tang
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of Google v… [read post]
7 Jan 2022, 12:05 pm
In the process it exposes students to the great contemporary battles over the meaning of law and its application within, between, above and through states and now other actors. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 10:52 am by Michael C. Dorf
” The board—one of whose members is Amy Jones, a parent of one of the U.S. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 7:21 am by Roger Parloff
A week before the Jan. 6 Capitol insurrection, Enrique Tarrio, the chairman of the Proud Boys, issued an unusual message to his crew. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm by Deborah J. Merritt
Jones 2012); the location of a cell phone (Carpenter v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:30 am by Dawn Zoldi
  With regard to the range for broadcasting MEs, 14 USC § 310(g)(2) states: Any broadcasting device used to meet the requirements of this section must be integrated into the unmanned aircraft without modification to its authorized radio frequency parameters and designed to maximize the range at which the broadcast can be received, while complying with 47 CFR part 15 and any other applicable laws in effect as of the date the declaration of compliance is submitted to the FAA for… [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
  The defendant’s application for strike out in this case was successful. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 6:01 am by Eugene Volokh
They deserve their day in court—not summary dismissal under a misguided application of qualified immunity. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:11 am by Kevin
The application had that pesky question on it that asks, “are you now under federal, state, or local investigation for possible violation of a criminal statute or disciplinary rule,” and Jones did not answer “yes. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 3:50 pm by Tom Smith
via www.spiked-online.com I believe my small and formerly cute university requires these woke loyalty oaths from all applicants to jobs, including jobs in the law school. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
' chant as the host of the Infowars show on which the video was streamed stated, 'Alex Jones at this moment is leading the march toward the Capitol building.'" "In the same video, [Shroyer] can be heard telling the crowd, 'today we march for the Capitol because on this historic January 6, 2021, we have to let our Congressmen and women know, and we have to let Mike Pence know, they stole the election, we know they stole it, and we aren't going to accept it! [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
The cost problem was starkly illustrated earlier this year in Webb v Jones [2021] EWHC 1618 (QB). [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am by INFORRM
On 7 and December 2021 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed,  Lloyd-Jones, Kitchin, Sales and Leggatt) heard the appeal in the case of Fearn v Board of Trustees of the Tate Gallery, a two-day appeal concerning neighbourhood privacy rights from the decision of the Court of Appeal ([2020] EWCA Civ 104). [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:03 pm by Taylor Ross
Jones and List argue that the state “over-corrected” with an “arduous, highly proscriptive, and inflexible” application process that inhibits growth and innovation. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
Jones -- but they had only two votes for such a reversal, so Waccamaw stood as the applicable law.In conclusion on this line of argument, I did not perceive a single member of the current panel who was ready to adopt ECUSA's reading of Chief Justice Beatty's 2017 opinion and simply hand over the properties to the national church -- including Chief Justice Beatty himself. [read post]