Search for: "Application of Smith"
Results 461 - 480
of 7,587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 May 2023, 1:52 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
12 May 2023, 11:45 am
For instance, in Smith v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 1:16 pm
The Supreme Court will be considering a total of 202 petitions and applications at Thursday’s conference. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:00 am
The court held that the carrier had a duty to provide UIM coverage under the applicable policy for injuries allegedly sustained in the underlying accident.In the end, Judge Smith urged the General Assembly to reexaming the MVFRL stacking provisions in order to bring clarity to the recurring issues faced by the Courts in this context. [read post]
10 May 2023, 10:53 am
Applications are open for the new Doctor of Business Administration program at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:58 am
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard 8th March 2023 R (on the application of… [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
The intentions of the framers of a given constitutional provision can be formulated as abstract and general principles or as particular expectations with respect to various anticipated applications of the provision. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:02 pm
For now, the existing CPGs will continue to serve as the OIG’s formal guidance to the applicable industry subsections. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:44 am
Smith, Larry Alexander, James Allan, and Maimon Schwarzchild, A Principled Constitution? [read post]
2 May 2023, 2:57 am
On Wednesday 3rdand Thursday 4th May the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Imam) v London Borough of Croydon, on appeal from [2022] EWCA Civ 601. [read post]
1 May 2023, 12:37 pm
Pileggi, Esquire, is the managing partner of the Delaware office of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 6:12 pm
Of particular note are the changes that the rule makes to the MLR regulations applicable to Medicaid MCOs. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 8:29 am
Raimondo, 22-451Issues: (1) Whether, under a proper application of Chevron v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
P. 5.2 and 26(c), if applicable. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:02 am
On Thursday 27th April, the Court will hear the case of R (on the application of Worcestershire County Council) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 1957. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Beck of the Philadelphia law office of the Reed Smith law firm. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 1:01 pm
The USPTO Fee-Setting Process Under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) the USPTO fee-setting process is a multi-step process that requires input from the Patent Public Advisory Committee (PPAC), a public hearing, and a public notice and comment period. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 10:41 am
Reed Smith continues to track developments related to this proposed rulemaking. [read post]
21 Apr 2023, 7:40 am
If you have questions on this topic, please reach out to the health care lawyers at Reed Smith LLP. [read post]
