Search for: "Asbestos Claimants" Results 461 - 480 of 556
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jul 2009, 8:23 pm
A second appeal has been filed, this one by the "Ad Hoc Committee of Asbestos Personal Injury Claimants. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 7:19 am
Kirk Hartley has been tracking developments.... [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:50 am
Some individual claimants and Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company (“Chubb”) objected to the Clarifying Order and subsequently appealed. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:50 am
Some individual claimants and Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company (“Chubb”) objected to the Clarifying Order and subsequently appealed. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 12:50 am
Some individual claimants and Chubb Indemnity Insurance Company (“Chubb”) objected to the Clarifying Order and subsequently appealed. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 12:34 am
Ultimately,a settlement was reached, in which Travelers agreed to make payments to compensate the Direct Action claimants, contingent on the court's order clarifying that the Direct Actions were, and remained, prohibited by the 1986 Orders. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 12:01 pm
Well, I do agree that future tort claimants have the strongest argument of all the appellants (and strangely, they are receiving the least press attention), which is why I was very interested to see that there has been a motion to appoint a future asbestos claims representative in GM.It might well be in GM's interest to agree to this motion, since the presence of such a representative might increase its ability to… [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 1:22 am
  Accordingly, as demonstrated by the objections themselves, the interests of tort claimants, including potential future tort claimants, have been presented to the Court, and the objections raised by or on behalf of such claimants are overruled.... [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
As such, he ruled that there had not been an inappropriate attempt to divert sale proceeds away from the Indiana Funds or to affect anything other than a pro rata distribution of the proceeds to all first priority claimants. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:30 am
The case concerned an asbestos related disease and an ATE policy with DAS 80e had been entered into by the Claimant with a three stage premium. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 12:05 am
Accordingly, as demonstrated by the objections themselves, the interests of tort claimants, including potential future tort claimants, have been presented to the Court, and the objections raised by or on behalf of such claimants are overruled. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:31 am
.'s product has made an important ruling on a Daubert challenge to a plaintiff expert in 13 cases involving 20 of the remaining claimants. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:19 am
However, can an insurer claim their Human Rights are being breached when it might just turn out those same insurers in respect of many other claims, do not respect the Human Rights of claimants or customers. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 11:47 am
  A plaintiff would not be required to prove numerically the dose, approximate or otherwise, of asbestos fibers to which the claimant was exposed that are attributable to the defendant. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 10:36 pm
 (a)  Requires a claimant, to recover damages for malignant mesothelioma allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos or asbestos containing products, to prove, among other elements of the claim, that a defendant's product or conduct was a substantial factor in causing the claimant's injury. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 7:39 am
A release or a covenant not to sue between a plaintiff or claimant and a person who is liable or claimed to be liable in tort shall be deemed a release or covenant for the purposes of this section only if:  (1) the plaintiff or claimant receives, as part of the agreement, monetary consideration greater than one dollar;  (2) the release or covenant completely or substantially terminates the dispute between the plaintiff or claimant and the… [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
We deal with a significant amount of asbestos litigation for defendants and pleural plaques work previously represented a sizeable proportion of that work. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:09 am
  The company could isolate asbestos litigation because all asbestos claims were brought against the Trust. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:09 am
  The company could isolate asbestos litigation because all asbestos claims were brought against the Trust. [read post]