Search for: "Austin v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,717
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
In Austin v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:35 am
—Austin Oct. 28, 2010, no pet.) [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 11:57 pm
Way to go Austin! [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
Speech First v UTA Case 19-50529. [read post]
28 May 2018, 1:42 pm
Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
This fall, the United States Supreme Court will reconsider the issue of affirmative action in higher education for the first time since its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:19 am
Phillips v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
Nealon’s Decision in the case of Locker v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
” Davis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 9:34 pm
—Austin 2007, no pet.). [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm
District Court Judge Lee Yeakel, who sat in Austin before his May 31, 2023 retirement. [read post]
30 Mar 2018, 5:43 am
After the Roe v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 12:58 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Grutter v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 8:00 am
Avilez v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 11:55 am
In that case, STATE OF TEXAS v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am
United States, in which the Court made it harder for the federal government to use the fact of a prior criminal conviction to increase a criminal sentence; American Express Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:23 am
FRAP 32.1.t So, lawyers can cite all they want to the Austin v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:13 am
The responsibility of the state to provide exculpatory evidence to the defense was articulated in the 1963 Supreme Court ruling in Brady v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
A member of the panel then states that, in her opinion, a Bivens cause of action does not require congressional action, and that the government’s argument relies on United States v. [read post]
