Search for: "Avery v. Avery" Results 461 - 480 of 481
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2007, 12:51 pm
Gillette Co., 87 Ill. 2d 7, 428 N.E.2d 478, 484 (Ill. 1981) ("the present case is predicated upon a series of essentially identical transactions"); Avery v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 2:19 am
Business doomed to failure Veitch and Another v Avery Court of Appeal “Any loss caused by a solicitor's negligence in wrongly advising his client that he was in default under a loan agreement with his bank was to be assessed on the date of the breach of duty. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 1:20 am
Bowen, defendants-appellees NEW YORK COUNTY Judges Judge Denies Motion to Recuse Herself in Action Involving a Co-op in Building Where She Resides Avery v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 9:32 am
Avery Poynter, 36 years old, pleaded guilty to traveling in interstate commerce for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual conduct with two minors. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 6:55 am
Adding to its impressive corpus of post-Booker jurisprudence, a split panel of the Sixth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 12:54 pm
Recall the April 9th Indiana Court of Appeals decision in A.B. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 2:28 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Samengo-Turner & Ors v J & H Marsh & McLennan (Services) Ltd & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 723 (12 July 2007) HIH Casualty & General Insurance Ltd v JLT Risk Solutions Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 710 (12 July 2007) Roberts & Anor v Gable & Ors [2007] EWCA Civ 721 (12 July 2007) Veitch & Anor v Avery [2007] EWCA Civ 711 (12 July 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)… [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
However, with the Rip-off Report, there have been plenty of allegations that Magedson writes the content himself rather than parrotting other people's content, and those allegations should survive a 12b6 motion. 2) Avery v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 11:11 am
"" NFP civil opinions today (2): Todd Avery & Kelly Elliott-Avery v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 2:18 am
[TTABlog Note: See the CAFC's decision in a companion case (here), holding that the term STEELBUILDING.COM is not generic for Applicant's services, but is merely descriptive and lacks secondary meaning.]April 18, 2007 - 2 PM: Diamonique Corp. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2007, 12:56 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law’s response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
We explore the marketing of branded service and the law's response through an analysis of Jespersen v. [read post]