Search for: "BLACK v. STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 10,096
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2021, 5:04 am
” As our country’s experience with stop-and-frisk vividly demonstrates, however, for police, reasonable suspicion is too often synonymous with being a Black or brown person in public.The practice of racially profiling Black drivers was effectively endorsed by the Court in the 1996 ruling in Whren v. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 2:13 am
The Board began by citing the oft-cited decision in Jacobs v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 5:06 am
Baldwin v. [read post]
19 Aug 2023, 4:49 pm
Cal.) in Crowley v. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 8:33 am
Case citation: Cisneros v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:11 pm
Kraemer, the 1948 decision in which the Supreme Court held that it was unconstitutional for state courts to enforce racially restrictive covenants. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
Abstract below: This essay uses the history of Sullivan v. [read post]
28 Oct 2008, 6:15 am
In McCrea v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 6:31 am
"The proponents of the 1866 Act did not assert that the 1866 Act permitted states to ban ordinary commercial contracts between blacks and whites. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 2:07 pm
" In Smith v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:23 pm
Ferguson the Supreme Court of the United States held that a Louisiana statute mandating separate but (in reality not) equal railway accommodations for black and white passengers did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause. [...] [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:44 am
Here are the materials so far in Black v. [read post]
16 Mar 2013, 6:48 am
Black, writing for a unanimous Court, ruled in Gideon v. [read post]
7 Apr 2003, 10:39 am
No. 01-1107, Virginia v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 1:47 pm
In addition to relying on Brown v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 11:30 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently gave a highly significant ruling in the case of Hurlburt v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 9:38 am
United States (1959) (Black, J., dissenting), "inconsistent with the spirit of [our] Bill of Rights," to try or punish a person twice for the same offense? [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 12:10 am
Teleflex decision:Scenario #1: Revive "synergism" test, where a combination of elements must result in an effect that is greater than the sum of the separate parts (Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
United States Supreme Court Gonzalez v Google and Twitter v Taamneh. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
The Supreme Court vacated the District Court’s judgment and remanded for reconsideration in light of its decision in Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. [read post]
