Search for: "BOUNDS V. STATE" Results 461 - 480 of 10,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In other words, the new law seeks to protect California employers and allow them to be more competitive by being able to hire out of state employees and not have them be bound by non-compete agreements in California. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Judith Gaskell
That provision was also challenged in Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm by Tomasz Tadeusz Koncewicz
And finally, in the most recent C-204/21 Commission v Poland, the Court asserted its authority in the strongest possible terms by proclaiming that, “the review of Member States’ compliance with the requirements arising from Article 2[…] TEU falls fully within the jurisdiction of the Court” (para. 62), and that Article 2 TEU is not merely a statement of policy guidelines or intentions, but rather “contains values which are an integral part of the… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:52 pm
""Although we agree with the dissent that the questions presented in this case are difficult, we are duty-bound to resolve them. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:00 am by Chip Merlin
’ However, as Plaintiffs correctly point out, although the document referenced by Travelers reflects pricing to fix other portions of the roof (such as the skylight and roof vent), the document states nothing about replacing roofing tiles. [read post]
A recent study found that 25-44 percent of pregnant people seeking an abortion in Alabama had to travel out of state, even before Dobbs v. [read post]