Search for: "BURKE v. BURKE"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,447
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2015, 6:03 am
The April post gained more than 14,000 likes, with basketball player Trey Burke and rapper Waka Flocka Flame joining in on the teasing.Following a public backlash, the post was deleted and Shaq and Burke apologized to Binion. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
In Burke v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:54 am
Justice Burke concurred in part and dissented in part, with whom Chief Justice Kite joins.Case Name: BRANDON LEE JENSEN v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
Flynn 81,833 170,000 - 7,500 259,333 Ellen V. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 10:12 pm
Our reports on the oral arguments from the September term of the Illinois Supreme Court continue with last week's argument in Schultz v. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 10:27 am
Meier and Howard V. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:22 am
App. 601, 662, 837 A.2d 989 (2003), aff'd. 383 Md. 484, 864 A.2d 1006 (2004); Burks v. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:13 am
Affirmed.Case Name: IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP OF LNP, A Minor Child: KC v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 8:44 am
Summary of Decision November 8, 2013Justice Burke delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
"Noting that there are some exceptions to the "violation of public policy" prohibition, the Appellate Division, citing Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, opined that a job security provision "does not violate public policy and therefore is valid and enforceable, but only if the provision is 'explicit,' the CBA [collective bargaining agreement] extends for a 'reasonable period of time,' and the 'CBA was not negotiated in a period of a… [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
"Noting that there are some exceptions to the "violation of public policy" prohibition, the Appellate Division, citing Burke v Bowen, 40 NY2d 264, opined that a job security provision "does not violate public policy and therefore is valid and enforceable, but only if the provision is 'explicit,' the CBA [collective bargaining agreement] extends for a 'reasonable period of time,' and the 'CBA was not negotiated in a period of a… [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 9:59 am
Reversed and Remanded.Case Name: TED NOBLES v. [read post]
2 Aug 2013, 1:12 pm
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: JB v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 11:59 am
OLSEN v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 7:40 pm
In Toftoy v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:48 am
Case Name: DANIEL RAY BOWLSBY v. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 9:18 am
Reversed and remanded.Case Name: IN THE INTEREST OF SWM v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 12:23 pm
Affirmed.Case Name: ERIC LEVANTER DEMILLARD v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:12 am
Clair County's Family Court; the family court judge that ruled in Mother's favor to allow a significant modification of the parenting schedule was reversed by the Court of Appeals.In Burke v Lobodzinski, the family court judge sided with Mother in her petition to modify the child's week-on-week-off parenting schedule, allowing Mother to move with the child from Bay City to Troy. [read post]
