Search for: "Bare v. Bare"
Results 461 - 480
of 4,975
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
This flash gave some bare bones details and led to much debate on the internal NL email discussion list. [read post]
7 Dec 2013, 5:33 pm
This flash gave some bare bones details and led to much debate on the internal NL email discussion list. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 9:16 pm
The poor costs draftsman barely got a word in edgeways. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
Such orders were made in the cases of ASG v GSA, DFT v TFD, AMM v HXW and KJH v HGF. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 7:24 am
., LLC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Addressing Respondent's contention that Petitioner submitted "false responses to discovery demands", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the court opined that "there was at least 'a barely colorable justification' for the arbitrator's conclusion that there was a lack of competent evidence to support [Respondent's] claim of false discovery disclosures". [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 10:35 pm
Pty Ltd. v. [read post]
7 May 2020, 5:11 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am
Pfander and Nassim Nazemi, Northwestern University School of Law, have posted Morris v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:28 pm
Lalani v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Addressing Respondent's contention that Petitioner submitted "false responses to discovery demands", citing Wien & Malkin LLP v Helmsley-Spear, Inc., 6 NY3d 471, the court opined that "there was at least 'a barely colorable justification' for the arbitrator's conclusion that there was a lack of competent evidence to support [Respondent's] claim of false discovery disclosures". [read post]
16 Mar 2014, 2:52 pm
The court cited Roe v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 11:00 pm
”And that sealed that deal.# # #DECISIONShalimar Leasing, LP v M. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 4:07 pm
In SPV Osus Ltd v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd, the Supreme Court held that maintenance and champerty also prohibit the assignment of a “bare” cause of action, that is, the transfer of the right to litigate a claim to a party who has no direct interest in that claim. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
On Monday, January 25, 2010, the Court of Appeal (Third Appellate District) in Sacramento held further oral argument in McAdams v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 10:10 am
Plaintiff barely survives the motion -- with the trial court noting that plaintiff's argument against the application of the usual rule (based largely on the knives, uniforms, etc.) seemed "stretched and tortured" -- but survives it he does. [read post]
13 May 2016, 2:58 pm
Sikkelee v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:15 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 11:40 am
In Coleman v. [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:16 pm
A district court judge who, at a bare minimum, definitely recalled this particular defendant and (maybe) what he had promised the last time around.So, this time, when sentencing the guy, one of the things the district court judge was miffed about was the prior (alleged) broken promise. [read post]
