Search for: "Barnes v. Points"
Results 461 - 480
of 697
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 9:24 am
Hummingbird Speedway" "Judge Offers to Facebook 'Friend' Witnesses in Order to Resolve Discovery Dispute -- Barnes v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 4:13 pm
This approach has succeeded in a very small group of cases, e.g., Barnes v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:13 pm
This approach has succeeded in a very small group of cases, e.g., Barnes v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 12:00 pm
” The most familiar example of this comes from the Supreme Court’s 1989 case, Texas v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 9:00 am
Read the decision at: Cowan v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
The SCOTUSblog case file for Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 9:50 am
Bank v. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:52 am
At the Huffington Post, Mike Sacks describes the Justices as “relatively muted” during the argument in CompuCredit, in which the Court is considering whether claims under the Credit Repair Organizations Act are subject to arbitration, while Robert Barnes of the Washington Post reports that the argument “launched the justices into round after round of questioning on essentially the same point. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:56 pm
CCA and B, LLC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 4:30 am
Barnes v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm
Matthew Barnes of 1 Crown Office Row represented the secretary of state in this case. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 4:54 am
Accufix Research Inst., Inc., 253 F.3d 1180, 1195-96, amended, 273 F.3d 1266 (9th Cir. 2001); Barnes, 161 F.3d at 143-46; Boughton v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 1:49 pm
City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 2:07 pm
The Patent Act requires that claims "particularly point[ ] out and distinctly claim[ ] the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:47 am
Barnes, 760 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1983). [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:18 am
So, for example, “[t]he more descriptive the term the more extensive must be the use to show that the mark has acquired secondary meaning to become distinctive of a particular company,” Jason Hachkowski v Lucas Barnes, D2009-1800 (WIPO February 5, 2010) (. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
(See Tafas v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:46 am
They didn't poll about a married man tweeting pictures of himself "in a discernibly turgid state," see Barnes v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 7:55 am
The starting point for the majority (Lords Phillips, Brown, Collins, Kerr and Dyson) was that every wrong should have a remedy, unless it was in the public interest to grant immunity: whilst the minority (Lord Hope and Lady Hale) were concerned of the chilling effect that abolishing immunity might have, and felt that such a fundamental rule change should be left to Parliament, the majority were undeterred by such considerations, pointing to the fact that since Hall… [read post]
