Search for: "Barns v. Barns" Results 461 - 480 of 2,610
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Feb 2012, 5:48 am by Lorraine Fleck
Last chance to register for OBA Institute IT Law for All: key IP law topics geared to generalist & in-house lawyers http://bit.ly/xMKQrU Microsoft withdraws one patent claim against Barnes & Noble http://cnet.co/AdSif6 Anonymous hacks lawyers for Marine accused of Iraq massacre cnet.co/yivSwI RIM should remain Canadian: Harper natpo.st/AkDl2B How to identify fake Facebook accounts cnet.co/xJY92x iPhone patent wars: What’s going on in Germany? [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:01 am by Matthew Scarola
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes characterizes the Term as an “assertive” one for the Court, with Chief Justice Roberts playing a dominant role. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 2:56 am by Amy Howe
” Coverage of last week’s decision in Birchfield v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am by Allison Trzop
  And in The Washington Post, Robert Barnes profiles the couple behind the challenge to California’s Proposition 8 in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 8:11 am by WSLL
Summary of Decision January 16, 2013Case Name: BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY, WYOMING STATE BAR v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 12:04 pm
Supreme Court oral argument in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 6:44 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Supreme Court won’t revive Kansas voting law requiring proof of citizenship (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court takes sides in interstate river flow fight (Pamela King, E&E News) Supreme Court puts off ruling on Trump census case to exclude undocumented immigrants (Pete Williams, NBC News) Why Trump’s attempt to steal the election was too much even for Republican judges… [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Briefly: In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes invites readers to “reflect on the fact that — once again — folks had to sleep on the sidewalk for days to see or hear the Supreme Court at work,” waiting for up to four days to gain access to the oral argument earlier this month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:10 am by James Romoser
Here’s a round-up of Supreme Court-related news and commentary from around the web: Barrett was trustee at private school with anti-gay policies (Michelle Smith & Michael Biesecker, Associated Press) Supreme Court split in Pa. election case raises questions about how a Justice Barrett would rule (Seung Min Kim & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court’s Pennsylvania mail ballot ruling tees up test for Barrett (John Kruzel, The Hill) Poll: Majority says Senate… [read post]