Search for: "Bell v. Bell*" Results 461 - 480 of 5,120
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2022, 12:27 am by Frank Cranmer
” Paul Bayes Treating children for gender dysphoria The Supreme Court has refused permission to appeal in the matter of Bell & Anor v The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 1363 – a challenge to the operation of Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust’s Gender Identity Development Service and its practice of referring patients under the age of 18 for prescription of puberty-blockers. [read post]
1 May 2022, 1:45 am by Frank Cranmer
In LF v SCRL [2022] EUECJ C‑344/20 (Opinion), Advocate General Medina suggests at [60] that “Article 8 of Directive 2000/78 must be interpreted as permitting Member States to adopt … autonomous protection as a means legitimately to determine, first, whether employees concerned by religious clothing obligations should not be placed, as a matter of principle, in a situation where they might need to choose between observing the obligations deriving from their… [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 7:54 am by Gus Hurwitz
Recent important antitrust cases included Pacific Bell v. linkLine and Verizon v. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Vavilov, 2019 CSC 65 [1] Le présent pourvoi et les pourvois connexes (voir Bell Canada c. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence J. Spiwak
Circuit’s 1973 ruling in National Petroleum Refiners Association v. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Specifically, in the recent case of Worsoff v. [read post]
24 Apr 2022, 4:47 am by Frank Cranmer
John Picton, Modern Law Review: Lehtimäki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law: on the UKSC judgment on the status of members of charitable companies. [read post]