Search for: "Bible v. State" Results 461 - 480 of 958
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2021, 10:03 am by Eleonora Rosati
As stated by one of the followers during the trial the consequences would be much more severe than any sanction from the courts: “Anyone who violates a holy scripture will, as the Bible says, be condemned”.Therefore, the followers published Martinus’ original work without permission. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 12:48 am
  The authority cited in support of this proposition is Pozzoli SPA v BDMO [2007] EWCA Civ 588, in which Jacob LJ stated at para 10: "I would add this about permission to appeal in patent cases generally. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:30 am by Dan Ernst
After conducting public hearings of employers and state officials, a regulation was adopted that declared birth certificates the most reliable evidence, followed (in descending order of reliability) by baptismal records, Bibles regularly used to record a family’s vital statistics, and affidavits from two doctors, one of whom had to be a member of the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
 Apparently at the core of the dispute is a theological disagreement over whether the Bible is the inerrant word of God. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:36 pm
There simply is no way to reconcile FCC v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 11:19 am by Lyle Denniston
The state courts had relied on a 1963 Supreme Court decision, in the case of Sherbert v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
Most notably, public school students read from the King James Bible, a translation which the Catholic Church did not recognize. [read post]