Search for: "Bishop v Bishop" Results 461 - 480 of 1,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2010, 3:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Her complaint was dismissed, sanctions were granted against plaintiff  and plaintiff moved to renew and reargue  On this motion and decision, Justice Marber recites the Bishop v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 1:01 am by Frank Cranmer
Bishops in the House of Lords This week, Pete Wilcox, Bishop of Sheffield, announced that he would not be voting in the General Election on 4 July. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:36 pm
The previous posts are the Introduction, Part I,Part II, Part III, Part IV and Part V.] [read post]
14 May 2023, 12:19 am by David Pocklington
Ecclesiastical lawyers will perhaps be more familiar with Martin v Mackonochie, Law Reports, Privy Council Appeal, Cases, 1867-9, pp. 386 to 392, and Mackonochie v Lord Penzance (1881) 6 App Cas 424. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 12:05 am by Frank Cranmer
He will be consecrated bishop on May 11 and will adopt the title of Bishop of Bardsey, as well as Assistant Bishop of Bangor. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 10:52 am
Liptak points to the mostly overlooked concurrence of Judge Jerome Holmes in the Tenth Circuit same-sex marriage decision, Bishop v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
 The Federalist also ran an analysis, more critical of Kavanaugh's record in this regard.The Washington Post last night ran an article titled: Judge Brett Kavanaugh — a Catholic — faces a historical struggle between canon and constitutional lawAlso last week, Daniel Cardinal DiNardo, President of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops sent a letter (full text) decrying attempts to generate opposition of any Supreme Court nominee based on his or her views… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 12:05 pm
Whether you have been following the Fujifilm v AbbVie case every step of the way or you are coming to it afresh, do not fear! [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
“The law plainly violates the First Amendment, the federal Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), and possibly other federal laws and clearly contradicts the Supreme Court’s recent, unanimous ruling in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Church and School v. [read post]