Search for: "Booker v. Booker"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,430
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2011, 5:35 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
In Ring v. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:19 pm
Richard Lonnie Booker, 2011 Cal. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
Then tell me why Richard Booker committed these murders.It sounded like just an ordinary night out with friends. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 1:32 am
Supreme Court Morge v Hampshire County Council [2011] UKSC 2 (19 January 2011) Coke- Wallis, R (on the application of) v Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales [2011] UKSC 2 (19 January 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Booker v R [2011] EWCA Crim 7 (19 January 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) A (A Child), Re (No 2) [2011] EWCA Civ 12 (19 January 2011) Enron Coal Services Ltd (In Liquidation) v English Welsh &… [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 2:45 pm
"* In terms of Booker, the Court notes that the Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial, the topic of concern in Booker, has no application in the Rule 35 context.* Court also notes, "Most importantly, in United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 2:29 pm
On Friday, the Seventh Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 1:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 4:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm
Booker, which declared the federal sentencing guidelines instructive, but not mandatory. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 8:05 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 12:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm
Pepper v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 10:07 am
Booker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 10:02 pm
Booker, 2010 U.S. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 8:15 am
Booker case. [read post]
20 Nov 2010, 3:29 pm
" United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 11:16 am
In United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
R (Booker) v NHS Oldham and Direct Line Insurance PLC [2010] EWHC 2593 (Admin)- read judgment The High Court has held that where a claimant agrees a damages settlement that includes an indemnity to fund private nursing care should existing NHS provision be withdrawn, it was unlawful for a primary care trust to cease its funding of the claimant’s care on the basis that her needs would be met through the settlement. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 10:38 am
For example, the New Jersey Supreme Court’s 20 Abbott v. [read post]
