Search for: "Boss v. Boss"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 6:09 am
The supervisor’s boss also purportedly had the authority to overrule decisions concerning route assignments. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 6:07 am
”Welcome to Parker v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 8:39 am
Judge Diaz dissented only as to the wrongful termination claim (Parker v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:02 pm
There are lots of reasons juries might screw up © cases, and it’s not clear that it’s jury instructions v. constructing their own good guy/bad guy narrative.A: Plain meaning is sometimes oversimplified—you can make the jury think their job is super easy, so you don’t want to do that. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 4:42 pm
The case of Richard Burgon MP v. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 5:17 pm
Kaur v. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 9:14 pm
" Massachusetts v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am
Maurer notes that in one case (U.S. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 8:34 am
” The employee was not entitled to severance.No Severance for Repeated HarassmentIn Hart v. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 2:30 pm
[Empirical SCOTUS] * Carrie Severino shares the disappointment of her former boss, Justice Thomas, in Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Kavanaugh voting against certiorari in Gee v. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 6:00 am
If we read the cases that build this new commercial speech doctrine, cases like Virginia Pharmacy and IMS v. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 4:11 am
In Lorenzo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 3:31 am
“[V]irtually all the state police … [and] also the local police … can get [the exemption] and the feds can’t. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 8:42 am
” Dias v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 1:07 pm
To support their decision, the appellate court cites State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2018, 8:01 am
His (or her) boss? [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:00 am
This was the question asked in English v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:21 am
Additional Resources: Faris v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 1:15 pm
United States and Intercollegiate Broadcasting Systems Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 1:37 pm
In Bartman v. [read post]
