Search for: "Bridges v. California" Results 461 - 477 of 477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Mar 2008, 6:29 am
Quite a fact pattern here: Constellation Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:01 am
Long Family Land & Cattle (on tribal courts’ authority to resolve certain civil suits) No. 07-210, Bridge v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 10:14 pm
Friedman DID NOT make the bridge to the structured settlement/settlement planning industry, PATRICK HINDERT DID. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 12:30 pm
I'd been taught as a young attorney NEVER to make the first offer -- folk practice where I come from, i.e., California. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 2:01 pm
A decision from the Ninth Circuit: Perfect10 v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 4:06 pm
Way cool.And of course September (at least part of it) is still in summer (at least in the northern hemisphere) . . .16th ECSL Summer Course on Space Law and Policy September 3-14, 2007, Noordwijk, The Netherlands.My kind of summer school.SPACE 2007 Sept. 18-20, 2007 Long Beach, California; not just law, but includes policy panels, a session on space law chaired by Mark Simonoff of the State Department and lots more.Manfred Lachs Space Law Moot Court Competition -- 2007 World Finals… [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 11:29 pm
PM and the passing of punitive damages class actions (2/27/07)Nagareda (implicitly) on preemption case selection (2/26/07)The bridges from Madison county (2/25/07)The Illinois Jensen case - a class action cautionary tale (2/22/07)Another stray thought on Williams v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 5:34 am
The response to our post in January on the Blain class action denial in the Paxil litigation, as well as the likely fallout from the just-decided reversal of class certification in Regents of University of California v. [read post]
22 Nov 2006, 4:43 am
Based on reweighing of private and public interest factors, Japan is not a more convenient forum for this action and thus plaintiff may pursue her action in forum that she selected.Communication Bridge Global Inc. v. [read post]