Search for: "Brown v. Scott" Results 461 - 480 of 683
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by NL
Pieretti v London Borough of Enfield [2010] EWCA Civ 1104 This is an odd case, in lots of ways, but what is decided in this appeal to the Court of Appeal is potentially of broader significance and certainly useful as clarification. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Adam Chandler
” Stone also notes that Massachusetts Senator Scott Brown’s vote is in play, and the Boston Globe calls his vote “the most defining ideological test yet of his young Senate career. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
Concluding that Applicant Scott Stawski was not entitled to concurrent use registrations for the marks PROSPER ESTATE and PROSPER RIDGE for wines, the Board dissolved this concurrent use proceeding. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 11:30 am by Ron Friedmann
Cohen of Winston & Strawn, Rachelle Rennagel of Pillsbury, Katrina Jasaitis of Mayer Brown. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am by Eugene Volokh
This can't possibly be consistent with the First Amendment; indeed, in U.S. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” For lawyers and law professors, constitutional history goes like this: the Constitutional Convention, Ratification, the Bill of Rights, the Reconstruction Amendments, the New Deal, Brown v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am by Edith Roberts
Sherrod Brown on Wednesday introduced a bill that would make that process illegal. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 7:15 am by INFORRM
Bryan Cave associate Robert Dougans, who acted for science writer Simon Singh in BCA v Singh and for blogger Dave Osler in Kaschke v Osler, raised a theme that was reflected by a number of contributors: the new difficulties created by the internet. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 8:27 am by Ronald Collins
To that list he now adds his own judicial biography of the man who successfully argued Brown v. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
Spiller v Joseph heard 26 and 27 July 2010 (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker and Brown and Sir John Dyson). [read post]