Search for: "Bush v. U.s.*"
Results 461 - 480
of 488
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2007, 9:57 pm
Lightbourne v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 9:03 am
The Bush administration, per an amicus brief by the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 5:09 am
” Bush v. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 9:21 pm
Again, it is not for the White House to say "what the law is," as we all learned reading Marbury v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 12:43 am
O.L.C. 101, 102.I also wrote that although this was a contestable conclusion -- and although there are many things about the 1984 OLC Opinion that strike me as wrong or overstated -- it was "fairly certain that the Bush Administration will not repudiate it. [read post]
7 Jul 2007, 10:48 pm
In an earlier post, I discussed some of the constitutional issues involved in ACLU v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 2:40 pm
Be that as it may, it's fairly certain that the Bush Administration will not repudiate it. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:49 am
Bush, 329 F.3d 1255 (11th Cir.2003), the Eleventh Circuit similarly concluded that 42 U.S.C. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 11:16 pm
Per Lott v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 6:49 pm
In answer to the questions posed in the UPDATE below, Peter Goldberger has cited the Supreme Court's Dec. 23, 1974, decision in Schick v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 5:28 pm
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 10:00 am
In Fox v. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 10:06 am
The Justice Department said on Monday that it will ask the full 12-member Fourth Circuit Court to reconsider en banc the panel decision in Al-Marri v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 2:29 pm
The order, issued in Khadr v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:07 pm
But on the theory that every case is precedent (except Bush v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 10:30 am
For example, in the 1996 decision in Felker v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 4:49 pm
As were Bush and Gonzales.3. [read post]
10 May 2007, 1:20 am
Congress' action upset the Supreme Court's 2004 holding in Rasul v. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 6:20 am
Riegel v. [read post]
