Search for: "Bush v. United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 2,560
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2009, 1:36 am
United States should be dismissed with respect to its challenge to the federal DOMA. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 12:12 pm
Bush wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld stating that Mr. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 6:15 pm
The American Civil Liberties Union represents al-Kidd in the case, al-Kidd v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
Source: ACLU v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 2:25 am
Source: ACLU v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:30 am
In his Proclamation 5517 (1986), he justified this exclusion on the ground that he “found that the unrestricted entry into the United States as immigrants by Cuban citizens would . . . be detrimental to the interests of the United States. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:57 am
Monday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 8:10 am
Bush; Hamdan v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:27 am
In fact, this part of Bush v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:46 am
The case is Gallop v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 1:25 pm
Originally posted here at Bush v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:22 pm
Far from what Jack attributes to him, above, Johnson is reported only to claim that the United States can target ”combatants” of any group that has “aligned itself with al Qaeda against Americans. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
Jewel v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 11:00 pm
” The question before the Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Ceballos, 547 U.S. 410 (2006), and Lane v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 5:01 am
This vacated a 2020 panel opinion that had rejected al-Hela’s claims on the grounds that, as a nonresident alien without presence or property in the United States, he possessed no constitutional due process rights. [read post]