Search for: "Business Entity Does I-X"
Results 461 - 480
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2010, 9:26 pm
New York has its own "mini-Stark" law addressing referrals to health care entities in which the referring practitioner has an ownership or other financial interest. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:41 am
The Swiss data protection authority brought suit against them (noted on IPKat here), claiming that this business model infringed data protection law. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 6:09 am
Does your partner or key staff have undeclared family or business connections to a competitor or supplier? [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 10:36 am
My only point is banal enough I suppose -- forming beliefs is a fairly complicated business. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:37 am
I’m not even sure that any but the largest and most sophisticated corporate entities could do so. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
A person in his dwelling, on his business premises or on real property owned or leased by that person OR THAT PERSON’S PARENT, GRANDPARENT OR LEGAL GUARDIAN. 2. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 4:07 pm
This is significant, of course, because the business judgment rule does not protect a failure to act in good faith. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
To get up to speed on the major provisions of Title X, I listened to a briefing entitled Dodd-Frank Act and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Creation of a New Federal Regulator. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am
I. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 8:35 am
Everything BP says and does is smoke and mirrors.. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am
I. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:00 am
So why does this happen? [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 8:44 pm
Our example could potentially be seen as a kickback, because it is a compensation arrangement in which the practitioner can be seen to be paid in exchange for referring patients to an entity (the Clinic), as opposed to getting paid market value for health care services. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:34 pm
The disaster in the Gulf of Mexico has already resulted in death, injury, environmental devastation, and economic loss to individuals, businesses, and governmental entities. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 7:06 am
Get three X’s in a row, and win! [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:18 pm
(d) This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:09 am
I deal in bondholder fulfillment – it also does two important capital-markets things. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:32 pm
I. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:08 pm
The use of secondary entities like trade associations is even more removed from any transparency or oversight. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 6:03 pm
-based entities to take advantage of the Section 337. [read post]
