Search for: "C. H. v. Attorney General United States"
Results 461 - 480
of 562
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm
(Greystone),15 and United Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 8:42 am
C. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
(Creative Commons) (1709 Blog) United States US General New IP enforcement plan from the US (Innovationpartners) Victory for US GI’s over Europe (Likelihood of Confusion) US Patents Filing of new false patent marking cases again picking up steam (Gray on Claims) USPTO to work with Google to make patent data available to the public (Patent Docs) The business method patent art units (Patently-O) USPTO must amend examiner guidelines on Bilski (Patently-O) USPTO… [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 7:01 am
United States, 81 Fed.Cl. 463 (2008). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am
Muntzand Kamae C. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 6:00 am
h. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm
United States (09-977); United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 9:34 pm
R&TC Section 17014(b) provides a special rule for certain United States Government officials and their spouses. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:49 am
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 May 2010, 10:24 pm
In Cross v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:50 pm
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:34 am
The bank files a Motion to Lift the Stay, and generally that motion is granted, because in a Chapter 7, the defenses just don't apply (there's no equity for the estate in the house, and the house isn't need for an effective reorganization, because there is no reorganization in a Chapter 7). [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
h. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
(c), italics added.) [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:45 am
Yet a highly effective mechanism exists for recovery of funds to the United States Treasury while simultaneously providing a significant economic incentive for the person who files suit. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 2:36 pm
—In United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 8:12 am
Hartman, John H. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
“It’s one of the most important threats to water quality right now,” said Miyoko Sakashita, a senior attorney at the group’s San Francisco office. [read post]
