Search for: "CALIFORNIANS v. CALIFORNIA" Results 461 - 480 of 591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2008, 6:13 pm
On the other hand, maybe the news that a little vanilla state like CT now has gay marriage will reassure uncertain Californians that they won’t be too far out in left field if they let their own supreme court decision stand. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Jan von Hein
In August 2010, they concluded a surrogacy contract with a woman in California. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 4:34 am by David DePaolo
And of course the cost of insurance to those employers will go up (over and above the untamed inflation in California). [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 5:46 am
I’ve briefly discussed the tort itself before, but here I want to focus on a jurisdictional question: Say you’re a Californian having an affair with a married Mississippian in California. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:59 am by WIMS
" [Class Action Fairness Act] <> California Dump Truck Owners Association V. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 5:35 am by Jack Goldsmith
If Fox is producing a story about a Californian, it will need to avoid including sufficiently intimate facts (at least so long as it worries that a judge and jury will find them not to be newsworthy), for fear that California law would apply.[16] Again, a state's law would thus have an extraterritorial effect on what Fox creates in New York and distributes throughout the country. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
Aug. 12, 2021) Prior CCPA/CPRA Posts * A Roundup of CCPA Court Decisions (I Only Know of 7) * CCPA Data Breach Lawsuit Against Walmart Fails–Gardiner v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 8:00 am by Gregory J. Brod
  This occurs despite Civil Code 1941.1 which clearly provides that the presence of vermin can render a unit untenable and decisions like Green v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 12:44 am by Michael Ehline
These motorbikes come with a V-twin engine offering unparalleled torque power and a low seat height perfect. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 9:07 pm by Adeline Chong
However, unlike the Osaka District Court, the High Court considered that since the obligation to pay punitive damages in California could not be denied, the payment made abroad through the compulsory execution procedure should be appropriated to the satisfaction of the amount ordered by the Californian court as a whole. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The judge even wondered whether a state that had not given any rights to same-sex couples might have a stronger argument for denying marriage rights than Californians had. [read post]