Search for: "CANNING et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF STATE"
Results 461 - 480
of 1,043
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2009, 10:22 am
McSorley's Old Ale HouseMarilyn A. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
It demands that Morrison satisfy certification requirements dictated by the New York Department of Civil Service and the New York State Education Department. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
(Ricci et al.. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 4:32 am
In practice, the only consequences UNESCO can exercise against a state are to condemn the state’s actions publicly,[30] to remove the state’s cultural heritage from UNESCO’s World Heritage List[31] (though UNESCO has only ever delisted three sites),[32] and to cease to provide the state with financial or technical assistance. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
At every level of government in the United States (and often in other countries), there are laws that empower the public to file requests for public records. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
Citing Williams v Sprint/United Management Comp [read post]
29 May 2016, 9:09 am
When we last spoke for the United States v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:43 pm
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the Cato InstituteAmimcus brief of National Apartment Association et al. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 9:32 am
Bush (ACLU et al., v. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
Sessions, et al., the st [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 1:33 pm
The Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Ass’n, et al., Case No. 19-cv-61053-WPD (S.D. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
(forthcoming)Amicus brief of the American Civil Rights UnionAmicus brief of the National Association of Home Builders et al. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Chamber of Commerce et al. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
California Pharmacists AssociationDocket: 09-1158Issue(s): (1) Whether Medicaid recipients and providers may maintain a cause of action under the Supremacy Clause to enforce § 1396a(a)(30)(A) by asserting that the provision preempts a state law reducing reimbursement rates; and (2) whether a state law reducing Medicaid reimbursement to providers may be held preempted by § 1396a(a)(30)(A) based on requirements that do not appear in the text of the statute.Certiorari-Stage… [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 6:07 pm
Next Door Company, et al. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 2:14 pm
Department of Labor and Industrial Relations, et al., case no. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
Introduction In going all the way to the United States Supreme Court, Kelo v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
Equally shaky is Marino et al. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:55 am
Radio Shack et al., Case No. 2:10-cv-07060 (C.D. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
THE CITY OF PALO ALTO et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
