Search for: "COOPER v. LONG"
Results 461 - 480
of 3,346
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
Cooper. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
Kramer v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:38 am
Drayton, 536 U.S. 194, 201 (2002) (law enforcement officers may request consent to search "provided they do not induce cooperation by coercive means"); United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Both Long v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 4:11 am
In a decision that gives new life to mob-related prosecutions, the Second Circuit has ruled in United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 6:01 am
Cooper, Federal Practice and Procedure § 4407 (2d ed.2002). [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 9:40 am
You can either settle down and cooperate or I can just take you to jail for running a red light. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 9:13 am
DPAs have long been a feature of the U.S. criminal corporate justice system. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 3:37 am
State v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:54 am
In City of Livonia Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 1:41 am
Selden and the decision in question is Columbia Motor Car Co. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 5:48 pm
The Judge does not appear to have been referred to recent “privacy” cases such as Cooper v Turrell ([2011] EWHC 3269 (QB)) which support this approach (see the Inforrm Case comment). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 3:08 am
The grievance arose after the State Department of Health changed its procedures with respect to surveying long-term health care facilities to ensure their compliance with State and federal laws and rules. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
The Court, in the opinion Boynton v. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
Take a deep breath, it's a long one...NEWSInformation obtained under mutual legal assistance provisions cannot be disclosed in financial remedy proceedingsThe Home secretary and the Crown Prosecution Service have won their appeal against Moylan J's decision in P v P [2012] EWHC 1733 (Fam). [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 7:08 am
United Statse v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 6:00 pm
Cooper Linse Hallman v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:20 am
The purchase agreement between plaintiff Southside and the seller explicitly permitted the seller to engage in a section 1031 transfer, required Southside to cooperate and did not prohibit the seller from assigning its interest as long as it did not allow another party to acquire the property. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 3:58 am
The purchase agreement between plaintiff Southside and the seller explicitly permitted the seller to engage in a section 1031 transfer, required Southside to cooperate and did not prohibit the seller from assigning its interest as long as it did not allow another party to acquire the property. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:36 am
Gonzales v. [read post]
