Search for: "CP v. State"
Results 461 - 480
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2017, 2:23 pm
In Rincon EV Realty LLC et al. v. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
In Matter of Karen P. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:16 pm
V. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:04 am
Feb. 6, 2009) ("Guinan I"), and Guinan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:30 am
Syr fire inv bur peace off Last Act: 08/15/07 VETOED MEMO.112 S4542A
KRUGER -- Relates to family offense proceedings in family and criminal court; provides concurrent jurisdiction over criminal mischief Same as A 8854-A BLURB : Fam Ct. fm offns prcd Last Act: 08/15/07 SIGNED CHAP.541 S5049
FUSCHILLO -- Relates to the definition of a vulnerable witness Same as A 4467 BLURB : CP L. vulnerable witnesses Last Act: 08/15/07 SIGNED CHAP.548 S5159
LAVALLE --… [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
In a New Jersey case, a very different result -- the state supreme court held that the state’s constitution requires a warrant. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 7:26 am
Sampson who crowed to the press about unproven abuse and spun justifications in the media to cover for what was essentially an illegal kidnapping at gunpoint by the state based on false allegations.Texas Lawyer also published nice features on its runner-up list of "Impact Players" for 2008, which includes:Andrea Marsh of the Texas Fair Defense Project, whose first case as an attorney was Rothgery v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 4:09 am
See the full opinion in Scroggs/Gariepy v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:30 am
We have already mentioned the application on 18 February 2011 in the case of Sky Andrew v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
Although there are no particular criteria for him to follow, he generally follows the CPS guidance (the current version is here; it is not particularly illuminating). [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/10/07 referred to correction
LAW / CORRECTNSA1841
Rabbitt -- Makes sex offenders 13 or older, juvenile delinquents, juvenile offenders, youthful offenders, subject to the sex offender registrySUMM : Amd SS168-a, 168-c, 168-e & 168-f, Cor L; amd S720.35, CP L; amd S380.1, Fam Ct Act Makes sex offenders 13 years of age or older, juvenile delinquents, juvenile offenders, youthful offenders, subject to the sex offender registry. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:30 am
Tamiz v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
They state that, “It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for prosecution. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 12:14 am
The statement was not intended to and does not represent a change to published CPS Policy. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany, heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Bukovsky v CPS, heard 5 October 2017 (Gross, Si [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
The CPS said it had decided to continue with the prosecutions of three Sun journalists; Jamie Pyatt, Chris Pharo and – in a separate case – Anthony France. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:10 pm
The claim arose out of an email sent by a CPS lawyer to a member of the public in June 2019 (2019 email) about a criminal investigation in which the Claimant was a suspect. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 3:54 pm
In so doing, the court must find that the denial of entry to the home renders the CPS worker unable to make an adequate safety determination as to the Smith children. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 1:00 am
On Tuesday 11 April, the Supreme Court will hand down the judgment in the case of SXH v The CPS. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 6:32 am
CPS Security Solutions, Inc., January 8, 2015, Corrigan, C.). [read post]
