Search for: "Campbell v. Ins*" Results 461 - 480 of 1,883
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2019, 8:02 am
As Campbell summarised, "These are powerful factors pointing in favour of infringement, even ignoring any enhanced distinctive character of the FUNTIME mark which has been acquired through use. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 2:57 am
Case Name: Williams Production RMT Co. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  Misuse of private information was recognised as a cause of action in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] UKHL 22 and is now firmly established in English law. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:30 am
In the Smith case, the Appellate Division, citing the Campbell decision, 271 AD2d 787, demonstrated this principle in a case involving an employee's termination for violating the employer's policy prohibiting sexual harassment. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:32 am
” Superior Court Justice Kenneth Campbell wrote that, in R v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
  The Judge noted ([110]) that these included the protection of human autonomy and dignity (see Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457 [51]). [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 8:22 am by INFORRM
The three appeals – in two libel privacy cases and one dealing with phone hacking – will give the Supreme Court an opportunity to reconsider the decision of the House of Lords in Campbell v MGN Ltd (No.2) ([2005] 1 WLR 3394) in the light of the decision of the Court of Human Rights in MGN v United Kingdom ([2011] ECHR 66). [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:13 am by Daniel E. Cummins
I thank Attorney Suzanne Tighe of the Scranton, PA office of Swartz Campbell for bringing this decision to my attention. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Jodie Liu
Weinreb closed by referring back to the images with which he opened: eight-year-old Martin Richard, music student Lingzi Lu, restaurant manager Krystle Campbell, and MIT police officer Sean Collier. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Daniel Fisher on Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 5:01 am by Terry Hart
In fact, when the Supreme Court embraced Leval’s “transformative use” in Campbell v. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 5:30 pm
The latest (v. 35 no. 2) issue of the Journal of Supreme Court History has another article on Justice Harlan, albeit one in a very light vein. [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am by INFORRM
As the Court of Appeal in McKennitt v Ash ([2006] EWCA Civ 1714)remarked, “A v B cannot be read as any sort of binding authority on the content of articles 8 and 10. [read post]